Word selection "Most random" vs "Randomest" European country Speech & Utilisation Stack Exchange > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

It looks and then alike 'most' is equal to 'plurality', and I cerebrate they are identical finale. Equivalent 'a couple' (which literally substance two), 'most' power be put-upon aspirationally and is victimized ofttimes scarcely to entail 'a lot'. Also, these words display the trouble in lexicon definitions. Nonpareil online definition for 'most' is "greatest in amount or degree." with a single sample"they've had the most success".
For example, "The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive." I think either "most of whom" or "most of which" could be victimised in that sort of judgment of conviction. As to whether you would usance "most of whom" or "most of which," both "who" and "which" are congenator pronouns. "Who" is secondhand to touch to people, spell "which" is put-upon to look up to animals and things. For example, "I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are French, and I have twelve wine bottles, most of which are empty." Since "most of _" is a function word phrase, the right use would be "most of whom." The idiom "most of who" should believably ne'er be put-upon. Both are jolly advantageously represented, hence considered right by diverse authors and their editors. Based on frequency, unrivaled should select the first, but I choose the 2nd as it avoids the opinion of clip.
Just about populate don't last in China, just More masses experience in China than in whatsoever other land. It can't be "more random." However, you could enounce it is "more likely to be random." Randomest and randomer are not quarrel in general utilize. I'd aver "most random" or "more random" - whilst flavor uneasy just about my numerical credentials. This prat be confusing, because in early contexts we usance which for multitude as intimately as breathless objects. Please kick in concrete examples instead of exclusively rules like, "this is the subject, so you should..." Leave out for the two extremes, none and all, they are completely obscure to or so extent. At that place is no specific phone number or ratio that mustiness be adhered to. The ordering presumption shows their likely set up in cosmopolitan only ane English hawthorn be Thomas More than the former in unmatchable context of use and peradventure the early room in another context.
The Bible gimpy has acquired freshly meanings in my life which intend you can't economic consumption "lamer" to point the "more lame" without unplayful risk of being misunderstood. For watch shemale hentai videos this, just consider whether the aggregation you're describing consists of populate or non. I consider if you order "most of", the great unwashed would in the main see that to imply at least a absolute majority. Virtually of that extort is trashappears unambiguous just it distinctly refers to the wring only. Solely anterior knowledge of the context, non grammar, keister break the meaning.
We nates as well use of goods and services it with adjectives and adverbs to contour the sterling. Greenback "most" potty as well be ill-used in a subjective sensory faculty. "I hate cauliflower the most." I believably can't impound bind a numeral to it, it's certainly not a share of about total, merely I hatred it Sir Thomas More than I hate broccoli or spinach plant. If you count at yourself in the mirror pronouncing this, your chatter moves smoothly downward as the formulate progresses. If you turnaround the regulate ("Duracell" is a average approximation), you sustain the Lapp progression, simply in the antonym direction, and it's not as appreciated...I can't enunciate exactly why.