Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) consists of concerns such as gain access to, waiting lists, health care protection, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly funded health care system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, particularly throughout the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back numerous years, including over the arrangement of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the factor for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends beyond your means on healthcare facility newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a largely "invisible cost" to the patient, healthcare appears to be effectively complimentary to its consumers - there is no particular NHS tax or levy. To lower costs and ensure that everyone is dealt with equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The general specialist (GP) works as a main gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is frequently difficult to gain higher courses of treatment, such as a visit with an expert. These are argued to be necessary - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your home of Commons, "we will never ever have all we need ... expectations will constantly exceed capability". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide health insurance coverage systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have given with the need for referral; direct access to a professional is possible there. [3]

There has been concern about opportunistic "health travelers" taking a trip to Britain (primarily London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British residents have been known to take a trip to other European countries to take advantage of lower expenses, and due to the fact that of a fear of hospital-acquired incredibly bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS access is for that reason managed by medical concern instead of cost system, causing waiting lists for both consultations and surgery, up to months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it one of its key targets to decrease waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be 2 years; there were aspirations to minimize it to 18 weeks despite opposition from medical professionals. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical problem is intense and life-threatening, a client will reach the front of the line quickly.

The NHS measures medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), an approach of measuring the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this approach of assigning health care means some clients should lose out in order for others to acquire, and that QALY is a crude approach of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital obtained infections

There have actually been a number of deadly break outs of antibiotic resistant germs (" very bugs") in NHS medical facilities, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has led to criticism of of health throughout the NHS, with some patients buying personal medical insurance or travelling abroad to prevent the viewed risk of catching a "extremely bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England hospitals in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of accessibility of some treatments due to their perceived bad cost-effectiveness often causes what some call a "postcode lottery". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and examine the cost efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually provided assistance on the expense and effectiveness of brand-new or expensive medicines, treatments and procedures, NHS services are unlikely to provide to money courses of treatment. The exact same of true of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]

There has actually been significant controversy about the general public health financing of pricey drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high expense and perceived limited total survival. The project waged by cancer patients to get the federal government to pay for their treatment has gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it accredited. [14] [15] Your Home of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug business for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is thought about the maximum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the concept of private finance initiative (PFI) came to prominence, all new health center structure was by convention moneyed from the Treasury, as it was thought it was best able to raise cash and able to control public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the regards to PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (structure of new facilities) had to take a look at whether PFI was more suitable to utilizing public sector financing. By the end of 1995, 60 reasonably small jobs had actually been prepared for, at a total cost of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were constructed and serviced by the economic sector, and after that leased back to the NHS. The Labour federal government chosen under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI projects, believing that public spending required to be reduced. [16]

Under the private financing effort, an increasing number of health centers have actually been constructed (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government also motivated personal sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been considerable criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health showing that for every ₤ 200 million spent on independently financed health centers the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The very first PFI hospitals include some 28% less beds than the ones they replaced. [18] Along with this, it has actually been kept in mind that the return for building and construction business on PFI contracts might be as high as 58%, which in financing medical facilities from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several high-profile medical scandals have happened within the NHS for many years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, exposed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had ordered the "dishonest and illegal removing of every organ from every child who had actually had a postmortem." In response, it has been argued that the scandal brought the concern of organ and tissue donation into the general public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s concerned opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried unusually high death rates amongst clients at the healthcare facility. [22] [23] Approximately 1200 more patients passed away in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of hospital [24] [25] based upon figures from a death design, however the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be deceiving to link the insufficient care to a particular number or variety of varieties of deaths. [26] A public query later exposed numerous circumstances of overlook, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]

" Lack of self-reliance of inspecting for safety and fitness for function"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have actually devolved health care, NHS England is operated on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with inspecting if the care provided by the NHS is genuinely safe and fit for purpose is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC describes itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it is in reality "liable to the general public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing comes from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one president [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is for that reason the capacity for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the exact same leadership and both are extremely vulnerable to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins prompted NHS England to focus on proof and security in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed restrictions on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the review's focus on kids's well-being. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of hospitals in England
Healthcare in the UK
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a routine information analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher guidelines to guarantee that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors attack Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you ill?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lotto'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug declined for NHS usage". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI medical facilities 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport health center deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding mistakes 'ought to be criminal offence'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'may have led to 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford medical facility scandal: Up to 1,200 may have passed away over "shocking" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How numerous people passed away "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit hospital leaves cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult centers". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.