How Free Evolution Changed My Life For The Better > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the concept that natural processes can lead to the development of organisms over time. This includes the emergence and development of new species.

This has been demonstrated by numerous examples, including stickleback fish varieties that can live in fresh or saltwater and walking stick insect species that are apprehensive about particular host plants. These mostly reversible traits permutations cannot explain fundamental changes to the basic body plan.

Evolution through Natural Selection

Scientists have been fascinated by the evolution of all the living organisms that inhabit our planet for ages. Charles Darwin's natural selection theory is the best-established explanation. This process occurs when people who are more well-adapted have more success in reproduction and survival than those who are less well-adapted. Over time, the population of well-adapted individuals grows and eventually develops into an entirely new species.

Natural selection is an ongoing process and involves the interaction of 3 factors that are: reproduction, variation and inheritance. Variation is caused by mutation and sexual reproduction both of which increase the genetic diversity within the species. Inheritance is the passing of a person's genetic characteristics to the offspring of that person which includes both recessive and dominant alleles. Reproduction is the production of viable, fertile offspring, which includes both sexual and asexual methods.

Natural selection is only possible when all the factors are in equilibrium. If, 에볼루션게이밍 for instance the dominant gene allele makes an organism reproduce and live longer than the recessive gene, then the dominant allele is more common in a population. However, if the gene confers a disadvantage in survival or reduces fertility, it will be eliminated from the population. This process is self-reinforcing meaning that a species with a beneficial trait will survive and reproduce more than an individual with a maladaptive trait. The higher the level of fitness an organism has, measured by its ability reproduce and survive, is the more offspring it can produce. People with desirable traits, like a longer neck in giraffes and bright white patterns of color in male peacocks are more likely to survive and have offspring, so they will become the majority of the population in the future.

Natural selection is a factor in populations and not on individuals. This is a significant distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution which claims that animals acquire characteristics through use or disuse. If a giraffe stretches its neck to catch prey and the neck grows larger, then its children will inherit this characteristic. The differences in neck size between generations will increase until the giraffe becomes unable to reproduce with other giraffes.

Evolution through Genetic Drift

In the process of genetic drift, alleles at a gene may attain different frequencies in a group by chance events. At some point, only one of them will be fixed (become common enough that it can no more be eliminated through natural selection) and the rest of the alleles will decrease in frequency. In extreme cases this, it leads to dominance of a single allele. The other alleles are eliminated, and heterozygosity decreases to zero. In a small number of people this could lead to the complete elimination of the recessive gene. This scenario is called the bottleneck effect. It is typical of an evolution process that occurs when a large number individuals migrate to form a population.

A phenotypic bottleneck can also occur when survivors of a disaster like an epidemic or a massive hunt, are confined into a small area. The survivors will have an dominant allele, and will share the same phenotype. This situation might be caused by a war, an earthquake or even a disease. Regardless of the cause the genetically distinct group that remains is susceptible to genetic drift.

Walsh Lewens, Lewens, and Ariew employ a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any deviation from expected values for differences in fitness. They provide a well-known example of twins that are genetically identical, have the exact same phenotype and yet one is struck by lightening and dies while the other lives and reproduces.

This kind of drift could play a significant role in the evolution of an organism. However, it is not the only method to progress. The most common alternative is a process known as natural selection, in which the phenotypic variation of the population is maintained through mutation and migration.

Stephens argues that there is a significant difference between treating the phenomenon of drift as a force or as a cause and treating other causes of evolution like selection, mutation and migration as forces or causes. He claims that a causal process account of drift allows us to distinguish it from the other forces, and 에볼루션 바카라 사이트게이밍 (howard-abrahamsen.federatedjournals.Com) that this distinction is essential. He also argues that drift is both an orientation, i.e., it tends to reduce heterozygosity. It also has a size that is determined by the size of the population.

Evolution through Lamarckism

When students in high school study biology they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution is often called "Lamarckism" and it states that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms through the inheritance of characteristics that result from an organism's natural activities, use and disuse. Lamarckism is typically illustrated with the image of a giraffe that extends its neck to reach leaves higher up in the trees. This could cause giraffes to pass on their longer necks to offspring, who then grow even taller.

Lamarck Lamarck, a French zoologist, presented a revolutionary concept in his 17 May 1802 opening lecture at the Museum of Natural History of Paris. He challenged previous thinking on organic transformation. According Lamarck, living organisms evolved from inanimate materials through a series gradual steps. Lamarck wasn't the only one to suggest this, but he was widely thought of as the first to provide the subject a thorough and general treatment.

The dominant story is that Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and Lamarckism fought during the 19th century. Darwinism eventually won and led to the development of what biologists now call the Modern Synthesis. The theory denies that acquired characteristics can be passed down and instead argues that organisms evolve through the selective influence of environmental factors, 에볼루션사이트 including Natural Selection.

Lamarck and his contemporaries believed in the idea that acquired characters could be passed on to future generations. However, this notion was never a major part of any of their evolutionary theories. This is partly due to the fact that it was never validated scientifically.

But it is now more than 200 years since Lamarck was born and in the age of genomics there is a huge amount of evidence to support the heritability of acquired characteristics. This is also known as "neo Lamarckism", or more commonly epigenetic inheritance. This is a version that is as valid as the popular neodarwinian model.

Evolution by the process of adaptation

One of the most popular misconceptions about evolution is that it is being driven by a struggle for survival. In fact, this view is a misrepresentation of natural selection and ignores the other forces that determine the rate of evolution. The fight for survival is more accurately described as a struggle to survive in a particular environment. This can include not just other organisms, but also the physical surroundings themselves.

Understanding how adaptation works is essential to understand evolution. The term "adaptation" refers to any characteristic that allows living organisms to survive in its environment and 에볼루션 슬롯게임 reproduce. It can be a physical structure, like feathers or fur. It could also be a characteristic of behavior such as moving to the shade during hot weather or escaping the cold at night.

An organism's survival depends on its ability to extract energy from the environment and interact with other living organisms and their physical surroundings. The organism should possess the right genes for producing offspring and be able find enough food and resources. Moreover, the organism must be capable of reproducing at an optimal rate within its niche.

These factors, in conjunction with mutations and gene flow can cause a shift in the proportion of different alleles in the gene pool of a population. This change in allele frequency could lead to the development of novel traits and eventually new species in the course of time.

A lot of the traits we admire in animals and plants are adaptations, for example, the lungs or gills that extract oxygen from the air, feathers or fur to provide insulation, long legs for running away from predators, and camouflage to hide. To understand adaptation, it is important to differentiate between physiological and behavioral traits.

Physical characteristics like large gills and thick fur are physical traits. Behavioral adaptations are not like the tendency of animals to seek out companionship or move into the shade during hot temperatures. Additionally it is important to understand that lack of planning is not a reason to make something an adaptation. In fact, a failure to think about the implications of a choice can render it unadaptive, despite the fact that it might appear reasonable or even essential.